How to optimize pagination pages after Google algorithms update
This article contains markup recommendations that were relevant at the time of writing (November 2018). In March 2019, Google updated its algorithms and now does not use these attributes. and are no longer signals for a search robot; tips for their use are removed from the official help.
"We noticed that for several years we have not used rel next and rel prev in the indexing process, so we decided that we can also delete this documentation," commented John Muelleron, a Senior Webmaster Trends Analyst at Google.
Now Google recommends webmasters to place all positions on one page, if possible, but assures that there will be no problems with pagination indexing.
"Use pagination. Googlebot is smart enough to find your next page by looking at the links on the page. We do not need explicit signals "prev, next". And yes, [you] have other good reasons to continue to add them (for example, [site's] accessibility for people with disabilities), added Ilya Grigorik, Google's Web Performance Engineer.
What is pagination in SEO
Incorrect pagination settings can adversely affect the site's location in the SERP. The following risks:
- exist duplication of existing content, which leads to sanctions from search engines;
- incorrectly marked pagination pages in most cases will not be scanned by robots beyond the first or second page. As a result, they will not be indexed.
Let's look at the main ways to optimize such pages for Google in detail, and also evaluate the difference between them for SEO.
Google and pagination pages
Rel="next" and rel ="prev" + rel="canonical" on the first page of pagination. If you do not optimize the text component of the pagination pages, the robot will scan all pages (including product cards on the split pages), but only 1 page will be included in the index.
Option # 2.
Rel="next" and + rel="canonical" on itself. For example, for the second page:
We do not recommend
The "Show all" button and the rel="canonical" attribute
With this attribute, you are reporting that all pagination-related web pages are accessible at a single URL, which should be indexed.
The scheme for introducing the attribute rel="canonical" is built up step by step:
- a common page is created for the entire cluster of goods, for example, all units from the "Coat" category;
- the button "Show all", "View all" or a similar in meaning, which adds items in turn, is added;
- The web page is indicated as canonical for the search by writing the special value rel="canonical" in the head part.
From the technical side, it turns out that we are creating a common page for the coat section at: http://example.com/palto/?&show-all, marking on other pages the URL:
The disadvantages of this method are several.
However, such a redirect to the first page is not described by Google, as recommended. Therefore, there are doubts about how positively this approach will work on Google ranking.
Google attributes rel="next" and rel="prev"
The method is considered the most suitable for use by Google, as the search engine will determine the most suitable page from equal priority ones. It is usually leaning towards the one that contains the largest number of positions to give the user the widest possible choice.
- Plus this technique: good positions that the site can really get on low-frequency queries. As a rule, low-frequency requests can attract traffic, which ends with a conversion to customers.
The hierarchy of web pages is as follows:
So that when returning from the second page to the first one the duplicate at does not appear http://example.com/category/page-1, the option "page-1" is removed from the links, setting the redirection from web pages containing this option (301 redirect) to http://example.com/category/.
Note that static text must be removed from all numbered pages, with the exception of the first. Do not allow the same text to be placed under different URLs. This will reduce uniqueness, which negatively affects SEO promotion.
Having divided the pages by number, we place the "link" in the initial section of the head from the first web page to the second:
Do not inadvertently close numbered web pages for all search crawlers. In doing so, let the search bots go through them through the "follow" meta tag.
It is important to emphasize that specifying canonic via rel="canonical" instead of these meta tags is not the best way out, because a mess will be created among different attributes. As a result, index-priority pages can fly out of SERP.
Layout errors, such as missing attributes, mean that Google will independently determine the fate of web pages in the index.
At the same time, Google allows the use of the attributes rel="next" and rel="prev" simultaneously with rel="canonical".
This provides food for thought about new ways to optimize pagination for displaying correctly in a search.
Remember that pagination pages are not added to the sitemap.xml website map.
With proper indexing settings in Google, this has a good effect on SEO optimization. Incorrect indexing of numbered pages can:
- duplicate content, and this is the probability of getting sanctions from search engines and lowering the ranking;
- entail long indexing that will degrade SEO.
But each search engine has its own vision of how it will index such pages. This must be taken into account.
Ideal settings for pagination for Google, we reviewed above. As well as a method that should maximize the satisfaction of both search engines and improve the position of the site in the search results.
This article is a part of Serpstat's Checklist tool
|Try Checklist now|
Learn how to get the most out of Serpstat
Want to get a personal demo, trial period or bunch of successful use cases?
Send a request and our expert will contact you ;)
Cases, lifehacks, researches and useful articles
Don’t you have time to follow the news? No worries!
Our editor Stacy will choose articles that will definitely help you with your work. Join our cozy community :)